https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/issue/feed Enigma in Cultural 2025-10-13T02:09:12+00:00 Katherine enigma.institute.center@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p><strong>Enigma in Cultural</strong> is an international, peer-review, and open access journal dedicated to art and cultural sciences. <strong>Enigma in Cultural</strong>&nbsp;publishes twice a year. The journal publishes all type of original articles, review articles, narrative review, meta-analysis, systematic review, mini-reviews and book review.&nbsp;<strong>Enigma in Cultural </strong>is an official journal of&nbsp;<strong>Enigma Institute</strong>.&nbsp;</p> https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/article/view/107 Echoes of Empire: The Politics of Repatriation and Decolonial Praxis in 21st-Century European Museums 2025-10-12T07:03:03+00:00 Alex Putra Pratama alex.putra.pratama@enigma.or.id Christian Napitupulu Napitupulu@gmail.com Aman Suparman aman_suparman@gmail.com Omar Alieva omar_alieva@gmail.com <p>The universalist claims of major European museums are built upon collections inextricably linked to the history of colonial violence and asymmetrical power. In the 21st century, a global movement demanding the repatriation of cultural heritage has challenged the very ethical and political foundations of these institutions. This study investigates the complex dynamics governing repatriation and the significant gap between museums' stated decolonial ambitions and their institutional practices, treating this dysfunction as a form of structural pathology. This study employed a mixed-methods approach grounded in a decolonial methodological awareness. The first phase consisted of a systematic thematic analysis of 188 policy documents from 25 major European museums (2019-2025), identifying the core logic of institutional responses to repatriation claims. The second phase developed a heuristic framework—a qualitative analytical model—to explore the logical outcomes of this institutional logic across three archetypal scenarios: a high-profile plunder case, a contested acquisition, and the return of ancestral remains. This model is presented not as a predictive tool, but as a framework for making the power structures and pathogenic mechanisms of holding institutions more legible. The documentary analysis revealed four key symptoms of a systemic pathology: a pervasive "rhetoric-practice gap"; the use of provenance research as both a facilitator and a barrier to claims; the strategic invocation of legal inalienability as an institutional defense; and a clear hierarchy of "returnable" heritage. The heuristic framework demonstrated that claims were most successful when high diplomatic pressure and clear evidence of looting created an overwhelming political imperative, while claims with ambiguity were likely to result in a chronic stalemate or offers of long-term loans. In conclusion, repatriation is not a simple administrative process but a deeply political and affective struggle shaped by enduring colonial power asymmetries. Genuine decolonial praxis requires more than institutional rhetoric of "slow ethics"; it necessitates treating the issue as a structural pathology requiring fundamental legal and systemic reforms, a shift in the burden of proof, and an acknowledgment of repatriation as an act of epistemic and restorative justice for source communities.</p> 2025-10-12T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/article/view/108 Toxic Sublime: The Spectacle of Ecological Collapse in Contemporary Art 2025-10-12T07:03:03+00:00 Gladys Putri Putri@gmail.com Bimala Putri bimala.putri@enigma.or.id Henrietta Noir henrietta.noir@enigma.or.id Jujuk Maryati jujuk_maryati@gmail.com <p>In the era of the Anthropocene, a significant genre of contemporary art has emerged that engages with ecological collapse by rendering environmental devastation visually captivating. This phenomenon, which this paper terms the "toxic sublime," presents a critical paradox: the aestheticization of catastrophe. This study investigates the visual and discursive strategies used by contemporary artists to represent ecological ruin and explores the complex ethical, political, and socio-economic implications of this practice. This study employed a qualitative, multi-modal critical approach. A purposively selected corpus of significant art projects created between 2015 and 2025 that address ecological degradation served as the primary data. The analytical methods included a visual semiotic analysis, operationalizing concepts from Barthes and Peirce to decode the aesthetic language of the artworks, and a Faircloughian critical discourse analysis of associated artist statements, interviews, and reviews. A heuristic modeling exercise, using a composite case study developed from real-world data, was also employed not to validate findings but to explore the generative logic of this aesthetic mode in a controlled, hypothetical context. The analysis identified a consistent taxonomy of aesthetic strategies central to the toxic sublime: 1) the strategic use of unnatural, hyper-saturated color to signify contamination; 2) the deployment of monumental scale to evoke awe and abstraction; and 3) the use of contaminated or synthetic materials as the artistic medium. The discourse analysis revealed a dominant framing of the artist as a "witness" or "alchemist" and the artwork as a "beautiful warning", which functions to legitimize the aestheticization process. In conclusion, the aestheticization of ecological collapse functions as a profoundly ambivalent cultural phenomenon. While it effectively captures attention, it risks neutralizing political urgency by transforming catastrophe into a consumable aesthetic object-a spectacle of decay. This study concludes that the toxic sublime is a defining aesthetic of the Anthropocene, but one that operates within the logic of the art market and the society of the spectacle. Its beautiful forms demand critical vigilance regarding art's complex role in an age of planetary crisis.</p> 2025-10-12T03:53:09+00:00 Copyright (c) https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/article/view/110 The Acoustic City: Sonorous Landscapes, Urban Memory, and the Politics of Noise 2025-10-13T02:09:12+00:00 Muhammad Hasan muhammad.hasan@enigma.or.id Jovanka Andina jovanka_andina@gmail.com Matilda Munoz matilda_munoz@gmail.com Emir Abdullah Abdullah@gmail.com Ahmad Erza Erza@gmail.com <p>The contemporary city is often conceived through a visual paradigm, yet its character is profoundly shaped by its acoustic environment. This study investigated the urban soundscape as a complex tapestry woven from sound, memory, and power. Focusing on the rapidly urbanizing context of Indonesia, this research explored how sonorous landscapes are produced, experienced, and contested, shaping collective urban memory and becoming arenas for political negotiation. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating qualitative ethnographic research with quantitative acoustic analysis. Fieldwork was conducted in two distinct Indonesian urban settings: the megacity of Jakarta and the historically significant city of Palembang. Methods included 60 semi-structured interviews with residents, urban planners, and community leaders; 30 researcher-led soundwalks using participant observation; and acoustic data collection using Class 1 sound level meters at 100 strategic locations. This data was used to create predictive acoustic models of selected neighborhoods using CadnaA sound prediction software to visualize and analyze sound pressure level (SPL) distribution. The findings revealed a rich acoustic lexicon unique to Indonesian cities, characterized by a dynamic interplay of religious sounds (the call to prayer or adzan), commercial vocalizations (street vendor calls), transportation noise, and sounds of community life (<em>gotong</em> royong). Ethnographic data demonstrated that these sounds are potent carriers of urban memory, evoking nostalgia and a sense of belonging, but are also sources of significant social friction. Acoustic models identified "sonorous hotspots" where SPLs consistently exceeded national health recommendations by up to 25 dBA, particularly around transport hubs and commercial districts. A significant disconnect was found between residents' subjective perception of noise and objective decibel measurements, highlighting the cultural mediation of sound. The "politics of noise" manifested in community-level disputes over the volume and timing of mosque loudspeakers and the perceived encroachment of commercial sounds into residential areas. In conclusion, the urban soundscape is not a neutral background but a contested social and political space where identities are asserted and power is negotiated. This study established that in Indonesian cities, sound acts as a crucial medium for constructing urban memory and a site for the subtle, everyday politics of cohabitation. Understanding these sonorous landscapes is essential for developing more inclusive and acoustically just urban planning policies that move beyond simple noise abatement to a more nuanced appreciation of the urban acoustic environment.</p> 2025-10-13T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/article/view/111 Virtual Veneration: A Critical Inquiry into the Sacralization and Valorization of Digital Heritage in the Metaverse 2025-10-13T01:58:50+00:00 Ifah Shandy ifah.shandy@enigma.or.id Kevin Setiawan Setiawan@gmail.com Khalil Jibran khalil_jibran@gmail.com Caelin Damayanti caelin.damayanti@enigma.or.id <p>The emergence of the metaverse presents a paradigm shift for how cultural heritage is experienced and valued. While technical digitization is well-studied, the socio-cultural processes by which digital objects acquire profound, quasi-sacred meaning remain critically underexplored. This study undertakes a critical inquiry into "virtual veneration," examining the mechanisms through which digital artifacts are sacralized and valorized within metaverse environments. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. Phase one involved a qualitative thematic analysis of three leading metaverse platforms (Decentraland, The Sandbox, VRChat) to identify key features of value creation. Phase two was a large-scale quantitative analysis of behavioral data from a diverse cohort of 10,000 users within the Virtual Artifact Interaction Model (VAIM), a controlled experimental environment. Acknowledging the philosophical limits of measuring "sacredness," we developed a composite "Index of High-Value Collective Attention" (HVCA) based on metrics of dwell time, interaction frequency, and social signal amplification to operationalize the behavioral markers of veneration. The qualitative analysis revealed three core themes: "The Architecture of Awe," "Ritualized Communitas," and "The Aura of Scarcity." The quantitative analysis demonstrated that "Community Narrative" was the most powerful predictor of an artifact's HVCA score (), far exceeding the impact of authenticity or scarcity. A significant synergistic effect was found between environmental conditions of "Exclusive Access" and "Ritualistic Interaction" (), confirming that architectural framing and social protocols work in concert. Social proof directed 65.4% of user attention, indicating that valorization is a socially contingent and path-dependent process. In conclusion, the sacralization of digital heritage is a complex socio-technical process contingent on platform design, community ritual, and perceived authenticity. However, this study concludes that these mechanisms, particularly when mediated by speculative economies, create a "networked aura" that functions as a political inversion of Walter Benjamin's original concept, re-ritualizing art for markets. The findings suggest the emergence of a "hyper-sacred"—emotionally potent but ontologically unmoored—posing profound ethical and philosophical questions for the future of cultural value.</p> 2025-10-13T01:58:49+00:00 Copyright (c) https://enigma.or.id/index.php/cultural/article/view/112 The Afterlife of Objects: A Material Culture Analysis of Contested Artifacts in Diasporic Communities 2025-10-13T02:08:17+00:00 Shasa Indriyani shasa.indriyani@cattleyacenter.id Sonia Vernanda Vernanda@gmailc.om Abdul Malik Malik@gmial.com <p>This study investigated the complex "afterlife" of contested cultural artifacts, specifically focusing on the Indonesian <em>keris</em> (ceremonial dagger) held in Dutch museum collections and their significance within the Indonesian diaspora in the Netherlands. In an era of escalating repatriation debates, the profound and evolving role these objects play in the identity formation, collective memory, and cultural negotiation of diasporic communities remains a critical yet underexplored dimension. This research addressed this gap by examining how such artifacts, physically distant from their origin, continue to live vibrant, meaningful, and often contentious lives within the communities they represent. A mixed-methods approach was employed, grounded in ethnographic and material culture studies frameworks. The research was conducted between 2023 and 2024 in Amsterdam and The Hague. Data were collected through 45 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with first, second, and third-generation members of the Indonesian diaspora. This qualitative data was supplemented by a quantitative survey (n=250) to assess broader community attitudes towards the <em>keris</em>, museums, and cultural heritage. Thematic analysis was used for interview transcripts, while descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to survey data. The findings revealed a multifaceted and dynamic relationship with the <em>keris</em>. Four primary themes emerged from the qualitative data: 1) The artifact as a tangible anchor to an "imagined homeland" and ancestral lineage; 2) Significant generational shifts in meaning, moving from personal heirloom to a politicized symbol of post-colonial identity; 3) The museum as a dual site of connection and contestation; and 4) The emergence of a "digital afterlife," where online archives and social media create new forms of access and community engagement. Survey data corroborated these themes, with 88% of respondents viewing the <em>keris</em> as a vital symbol of their cultural identity, yet 65% expressing feelings of ambivalence or sadness regarding their location in Dutch museums. In conclusion, contested artifacts like the <em>keris</em> are not static relics but dynamic agents in the ongoing process of diasporic identity construction. Their afterlife is characterized by a continuous re-negotiation of meaning across generations and platforms. For diasporic communities, these objects serve as powerful conduits for memory, heritage, and political consciousness, complicating simplistic narratives of ownership and repatriation. The study concluded that understanding this diasporic dimension is essential for museums and policymakers engaging in ethical stewardship and decolonization efforts.</p> 2025-10-13T02:08:16+00:00 Copyright (c)